Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Olmstead v. Amoco Oil Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Olmstead v. Amoco Oil Company Anchor | green | “extends not only to the precise legal theory presented in the previous litigation, but to all legal theories and claims arising out of the same 'operative nucleus of fact.” | 10 |
| 2 | Manning v. City Of Auburn | green | “we do not believe that the res judicata preclusion of claims that 'could have been brought' in earlier litigation includes claims which arise after the original pleading is filed in the earlier litigation.” | 5 |
| 3 | Israel Discount Bank Ltd. v. Robert M. Entin, Alexander Halberstein and Kan Rap, Inc. | green | “compare the factual issues explored in the first action with the factual issues to be resolved in the second.” | 3 |
| 4 | In Re Marion Seidler, Debtor. Thomas Russo, Dorothy Russo v. Marion Seidler | green | “premised on the notion that the bankruptcy court has addressed in the confirmed plan and order only those issues that are properly within the scope of the confirmation hearing.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.