Topic: on a piece-meal basis and then ended its analysis. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #16622

8 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Anton E. Barker v. Gary Fleming.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Anton E. Barker v. Gary Fleming Anchor
ca9 · 2005
green “on a piece-meal basis and then ended its analysis.” 3
2 Kessee v. Mendoza-Powers
ca9 · 2009
green “the task of determining the precise contours of that exception has been left to the federal appellate courts.” 3
3 State v. Doody
arizctapp · 1996
green “doody did not speak for long periods during the interrogation.” 3
4 State v. Doody
arizctapp · 1996
green “no evidence that calls into question the testimony that doody remained alert and responsive.” 3
5 State v. Doody
arizctapp · 1996
green “courteous, almost pleading style of questioning during most of the interview.” 3
6 DeWeaver v. Runnels
ca9 · 2009
green “we review the federal district court's decision to deny doody's habeas petition de novo.” 3
7 DeWeaver v. Runnels
ca9 · 2009
green “extends or fails to extend a clearly established legal principle to a new context in a way that is objectively unreasonable” 3
8 Porter v. Triad of Arizona (L.P.)
arizctapp · 2002
green “in arizona, a minor is never allowed to bring an action in his own name but must always sue through a representative whatever the cause of action.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check