Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Parle v. Runnels.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parle v. Runnels Anchor | green | “far less persuasive than it might otherwise have been.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Reinhold Sommerstedt | green | “a defendant may be convicted of violating section 111 if he . . . uses any force whatsoever against a federal officer,” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Steve Rudberg | green | “when applying the plain error standard, we consider all circumstances at trial including the strength of the evidence against the defendant.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Terrill Dixon | green | “a chain of unbroken inferences” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Jack Alan Geston, United States of America v. Jack Alan Geston | green | “by assessing the witnesses and witness testimony in light of their own experience.” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Jack Alan Geston, United States of America v. Jack Alan Geston | green | “in a case where witness credibility was paramount.” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Dale Roy Combs | green | “much of it was equally consistent with combs's defense,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.