Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 167 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Park Irmat Drug Corp. v. Express Scripts Holding Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Park Irmat Drug Corp. v. Express Scripts Holding Co. Anchor | green | “allow the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” | 76 |
| 2 | Huggins v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. | green | “must liberally construe a complaint in favor of the plaintiff.” | 49 |
| 3 | Joseph H. Whitney v. The Guys, Inc. | green | “allow the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” | 22 |
| 4 | Hamilton v. Palm | green | “a pleading that merely pleads 'labels and conclusions,' or a 'formulaic recitation' of the elements of a cause of action, or 'naked assertions' devoid of factual enhancement will not suffice.” | 20 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.