Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Myra J. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONSBANK OF FLORIDA N.A., a Florida Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Myra J. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONSBANK OF FLORIDA N.A., a Florida Corporation, Defendant-Appellee Anchor | green | “the admissibility of evidence is committed to the broad discretion of the district court, and the decision to exclude certain evidence will be reversed only upon a clear showing of abuse of discretion.” | 5 |
| 2 | Travis O'Neal James v. Otis Elevator Company | green | “a fact that can only be decided by a coin toss has not been proven by a preponderance of the evidence, and cannot be submitted to the jury.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Victor Posner | green | “a statement made in furtherance of a conspiracy 'must somehow advance the objectives of the conspiracy, not merely inform the listener of the declarant's activities,” | 3 |
| 4 | Guccione v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. | green | “concerned a matter within the scope of his agency or employment, made during the existence of the relationship.” | 3 |
| 5 | City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc. | green | “does not have that much economic power to make a conspiracy stick.” | 3 |
| 6 | City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc. | green | “got together with the people who were submitting the bids and they knew what each other were going to bid before that bid was ever submitted.” | 3 |
| 7 | City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc. | green | “having ruled there is no conspiracy, the court finds there can be no fraud for failure to disclose it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.