Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Erlich v. Menezes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Erlich v. Menezes Anchor | green | “courts will generally enforce the breach of a contractual promise through contract law, except when the actions that constitute the breach violate a social policy that merits the imposition of tort remedies.” | 6 |
| 2 | Stanton Road Associates v. Pacific Employers Insurance | green | “as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law. we also consider matters which may be judicially noticed.” | 5 |
| 3 | Stanton Road Associates v. Pacific Employers Insurance | green | “liberally . . . with a view to substantial justice between the parties” | 4 |
| 4 | Podolsky v. First Healthcare Corp. | green | “act or practice,' presumably permitting invocation of the uca based on a single instance of unfair conduct.” | 3 |
| 5 | Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n | green | “no fiduciary duty exists between a borrower and lender in an arm's length transaction” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.