Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cross v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cross v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield Anchor | green | “is limited to determining whether there is any competent evidence to support the findings of fact, and whether the findings of fact justify the conclusions of law.” | 13 |
| 2 | Hardin v. Motor Panels, Inc. | green | “the findings of the commission are conclusive on appeal when such competent evidence exists, even if there is plenary evidence for contrary findings.” | 10 |
| 3 | Hardin v. Motor Panels, Inc. | green | “when such competent evidence exists, even if there is plenary evidence for contrary findings.” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.