Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Barn-Chestnut, Inc. v. CFM Development Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barn-Chestnut, Inc. v. CFM Development Corp. Anchor | green | “the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing cannot give contracting parties rights which are inconsistent with those set out in the contract.” | 9 |
| 2 | Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Incorporated | green | “forecast evidence sufficient to prove an element” | 8 |
| 3 | Stand Energy Corp. v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. | green | “implies a covenant of good faith and fair dealing in every contract for purposes of evaluating a party's performance of that contract.” | 4 |
| 4 | Berkeley County Public Service District v. Vitro Corp. of America | green | “the mere fact that parties do not agree to the construction of a contract does not render it ambiguous.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.