Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bicycle Transit Authority, Inc. v. Bell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bicycle Transit Authority, Inc. v. Bell Anchor | green | “an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.” | 6 |
| 2 | Nelson v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance | green | “has the burden of bringing itself within the insuring language of the policy.” | 6 |
| 3 | Topsail Reef Homeowners Ass'n v. Zurich Specialties London, Ltd. | green | “when an insurer denies a claim because of a legitimate, 'honest disagreement' as to the validity of the claim, the insurer is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the plaintiff cannot establish bad faith or any tortious conduct on the part of the insurer.” | 5 |
| 4 | Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Lallier | green | “willfully, or under circumstances of rudeness or oppression, or in a manner which evinces a reckless and wanton disregard of the plaintiff's rights.” | 4 |
| 5 | Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Lallier | green | “when an insurer denies a claim because of a legitimate, 'honest disagreement' as to the validity of the claim, the insurer is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the plaintiff cannot establish bad faith or any tortious conduct on the part of the insurer.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.