Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 812 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Vermont Teddy Bear Company, Inc. v. 1-800 Beargram Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vermont Teddy Bear Company, Inc. v. 1-800 Beargram Company Anchor | green | “it is the movant's burden to show that no genuine factual dispute exists.” | 190 |
| 2 | Brod v. Omya, Inc. | green | “the role of the court is not to resolve disputed issues of fact but to assess whether there are any factual issues to be tried.” | 153 |
| 3 | Royal Crown Day Care LLC v. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene | green | “on a motion for summary judgment, a fact is material if it might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.” | 130 |
| 4 | Wright v. Goord | green | “when a motion for summary judgment is properly supported by documents or other evidentiary materials, the party opposing summary judgment may not merely rest on the allegations or denials of his pleading . . . .” | 76 |
| 5 | Guardian Life Insurance v. Gilmore | green | “when a motion for summary judgment is properly supported by documents or other evidentiary materials, the party opposing summary judgment may not merely rest on the allegations or denials of his pleading . . . .” | 74 |
| 6 | Cilp Associates, L.P. v. Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP | green | “however, when the burden of proof at trial would fall on the nonmoving party, it ordinarily is sufficient for the movant to point to a lack of evidence to go to the trier of fact on an essential element of the nonmovant's claim,” | 73 |
| 7 | Nora Beverages, Inc. v. Perrier Group Of America, Inc. | green | “where a party relies on affidavits . . . to establish facts, the statements 'must be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant . . . is competent to testify on the matters stated.” | 64 |
| 8 | Brod v. Omya, Inc. | green | “construe the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and . . . resolve all ambiguities and draw all reasonable inferences against the movant.” | 52 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.