Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Edward.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Edward Anchor | green | “tends to undercut the notion that his free will was overborne by the officer's remarks.” | 5 |
| 2 | People v. Webb | green | “police trickery . . . does not, by itself, render a confession involuntary.” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Bennett | green | “the defendant's ability to obtain prison wages and to earn money after his release from custody.” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Montano | green | “continued interrogation after a defendant has invoked his” | 4 |
| 5 | People v. Gamache | green | “points to no evidence in the record supporting his inability to pay” | 4 |
| 6 | People v. Gamache | green | “because defendant 'points to no evidence in the record supporting his inability to pay' (people v. gamache (2010) 48 cal.4th 347, 409 ), and hence no evidence that he would suffer any consequence for non- payment, a remand would serve no purpose.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.