Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McDonald v. McDonald.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McDonald v. McDonald Anchor | green | “the well-recognized rule is that a trial court will not be put in error on appeal for a matter not presented to it for decision.” | 6 |
| 2 | O.W.O. Investments, Inc. v. Stone Investment Co. | green | “this court does not consider unsupported assignments of error.” | 3 |
| 3 | Duncan v. Duncan | green | “manifestly wrong or clearly erroneous.” | 3 |
| 4 | Gable v. Gable | green | “personally evaluate the witnesses' testimony and the parties' behavior.” | 3 |
| 5 | Butt v. State | green | “does not prevent former spouses from testifying against each other, even relating to acts during the marriage, so long as the testimony was not privileged communication.” | 3 |
| 6 | Butt v. State | green | “to events surrounding her marriage and the eventual end of her marriage.” | 3 |
| 7 | Perkins v. Perkins | green | “a rule 60(b) motion should be denied where it is merely an attempt to relitigate a case.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.