Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ex Parte Nall.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ex Parte Nall Anchor | green | “ex parte nall, 879 so. 2d 541, 543 (ala. 2003) (quoting ex parte boc grp., inc., 823 so. 2d 1270, 1272 (ala. 2001)).” | 11 |
| 2 | Wainwright ex rel. Sterne Agee Grp., Inc. v. Holbrook (In re Sanderson) | neutral | “this court has recognized that an appeal is an inadequate remedy in cases where it has determined that a defendant should not have been subjected to the inconvenience of litigation because it was clear from the face of the complaint that the defendant was entitled to a dismissal…” | 6 |
| 3 | Howell v. City of Dothan | green | “when a plaintiff landowner seeks damages for the contamination of a well or stream.” | 4 |
| 4 | Moon v. Harco Drugs, Inc. | green | “when a plaintiff landowner seeks damages for the contamination of a well or stream.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.