Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Insurance Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Insurance Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Anchor | green | “a contract is ambiguous if it is reasonably susceptible of different constructions and capable of being understood in more than one sense.” | 11 |
| 2 | Insurance Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance | green | “when the terms of a contract are clear and unambiguous, the intent of the parties is to be ascertained from the document itself.” | 9 |
| 3 | West v. Lincoln Benefit Life Co. | green | “an unclear, ambiguous provision will be construed against the insurer and in favor of the insured.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.