Topic: an order remanding the case may require payment of just cos… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #1688

7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 165 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp. Anchor
scotus · 2005
green “an order remanding the case may require payment of just costs and any actual expenses, including attorney fees, incurred as a result of the removal.” 128
2 Robert Stallworth v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority David Vegh and Ronald Tober
ca6 · 1997
green “a district court, after issuing an order of remand, may make an award of attorney fees and costs in a separate order.” 7
3 Warthman v. Genoa Township Board of Trustees
ca6 · 2008
green “in general, objectively unreasonable removals should result in fee awards to plaintiff.” 7
4 City of Milwaukee v. Cement Division, National Gypsum Co.
scotus · 1995
green “as is always the case when an issue is committed to judicial discretion, the judge's decision must be supported by a circumstance that has relevance to the issue at hand” 6
5 Everett Hadix v. Perry Johnson
ca6 · 1995
green “this circuit uses the 'community market rule' to calculate a reasonable billing rate.” 6
6 Vicki Linneman v. Vita-Mix Corp.
ca6 · 2020
green “this circuit uses the 'community market rule' to calculate a reasonable billing rate.” 6
7 Vicki Linneman v. Vita-Mix Corp.
ca6 · 2020
green “a list of pre- calculated billing rates tiered by years of experience” 5

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check