Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pfahler v. National Latex Products Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pfahler v. National Latex Products Co. Anchor | green | “failure to object to the magistrate judge's recommendations constituted a waiver of th defendant's ability to appeal the district court's ruling” | 17 |
| 2 | Steward v. City of Jackson | green | “rule 41(b) recognizes the power of the district court to enter a sua sponte order of dismissal.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.