Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 166 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from L.B. LOVELACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | L.B. LOVELACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee Anchor | green | “a finding that a claimant is disabled or is not disabled at any point in the five-step review is conclusive and terminates the analysis.” | 58 |
| 2 | Harris v. Apfel | green | “a finding of no substantial evidence is appropriate only if no credible evidentiary choices or medical findings support the decision.” | 29 |
| 3 | Brown v. Apfel | green | “conflicts in the evidence are for the commissioner and not the courts to resolve.” | 26 |
| 4 | Travis RIPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee | green | “substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept to support a conclusion.” | 21 |
| 5 | Boyd v. Apfel | green | “it is more than a mere scintilla and less than a preponderance.” | 18 |
| 6 | Higginbotham v. Barnhart | green | “the commissioner's decision does not become final until after the ac makes its decision denying the claimant's request for review.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.