Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mugno v. Mugno.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mugno v. Mugno Anchor | green | “a single distributional factor may support an unequal division.” | 5 |
| 2 | Alexander v. Alexander | green | “market value, if any, less the amount of any encumbrance serving to offset or reduce market value.” | 4 |
| 3 | Britt v. Britt | green | “potential changes in the value of marital or divisible property between the hearing and entry of the equitable distribution order to warrant additional consideration by the trial court.” | 3 |
| 4 | Troutman v. Troutman | green | “accordingly, this court will not reverse a trial court's findings of fact on appeal as long as they are supported by competent evidence.” | 3 |
| 5 | Mrozek v. Mrozek | green | “findings of fact are conclusive if they are supported by any competent evidence from the record.” | 3 |
| 6 | Hill v. Sanderson | green | “at the time anthony left the home the cougar was valued at 4000 in the blue kelley book, and the lincoln was valued at 2000.” | 3 |
| 7 | Hill v. Sanderson | green | “within the range of the plaintiff's and defendant's valuations.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.