Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Sullivan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Sullivan Anchor | green | “if the charge has the effect of forcing a juror to surrender an honest conviction, it is coercive and constitutes reversible error.” | 8 |
| 2 | People v. Sullivan | green | “the optimum instruction will generate discussion directed towards the resolution of the case but will avoid forcing a decision.” | 6 |
| 3 | People v. Hardin | green | “an undue tendency of coercion-e.g., could the instruction given cause a juror to abandon his conscientious dissent and defer to the majority solely for the sake of reaching agreement?” | 5 |
| 4 | People v. Hardin | green | “must be examined in the factual context in which it is given” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.