3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ward v. Hall.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ward v. Hall Anchor | green | “the fact that a particular defense was unsuccessful does not prove ineffective assistance of counsel” | 8 |
| 2 | Sabas Jaimes Enriques v. United States | green | “although pro se pleadings are construed more liberally than those filed by counsel, . . . issues not argued by a pro se litigant in his initial brief are deemed waived.” | 6 |
| 3 | Ward v. Hall | green | “we have long held that the fact that a particular defense was unsuccessful does not prove ineffective assistance of counsel.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.