Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State, Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility Commission of Texas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State, Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Public Utility Commission of Texas Anchor | green | “impliedly intends that the agency have whatever powers are reasonably necessary to fulfill its express functions or duties,” | 10 |
| 2 | Employees Retirement System of Texas v. Jones | green | “to serious consideration by reviewing courts, so long as that construction is reasonable and does not contradict the plain language of the statute.” | 7 |
| 3 | Bullock v. Hewlett-Packard Co. | green | “the reasonableness of the board's rule,” | 4 |
| 4 | Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. State | green | “words and phrases that have acquired a technical or particular meaning” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.