Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Milne.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Milne Anchor | green | “absent compelling, extenuating circumstances, the burden to justify filing a petition after the five-year period will increase with the extent of the delay.” | 9 |
| 2 | State v. Milne | green | “compelling, extenuating circumstances,” | 9 |
| 3 | State v. Norman | green | “consider the extent and cause of the delay, the prejudice to the state, and the importance of the petitioner's claim in determining whether there has been an 'injustice' sufficient to relax the time limits.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.