Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Whitehurst.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Whitehurst Anchor | green | “the people have the burden of going forward to show the legality of the police conduct in the first instance” | 15 |
| 2 | People v. Baliukonis | green | “are entitled to great deference on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Baliukonis | green | “the factual findings and credibility determinations of the supreme court following a suppression hearing are entitled to great deference on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Thomas | green | “bears the ultimate burden of proving, by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that the evidence should not be used against him” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.