Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Matlock, Marcus Dewayne.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matlock, Marcus Dewayne Anchor | green | “against the great weight of the evidence as to be manifestly unjust, conscience-shocking, or clearly biased.” | 7 |
| 2 | Matlock, Marcus Dewayne | green | “against the great weight and preponderance” | 6 |
| 3 | Matlock, Marcus Dewayne | green | “in the factual-sufficiency review of a rejected affirmative defense, an appellate court views the entirety of the evidence in a neutral light, but it may not usurp the function of the jury by substituting its judgment in place of the jury's assessment of the weight and credibili…” | 5 |
| 4 | Gonzales v. State | green | “for a claim of fear to rise to the level of sudden passion, the defendant's mind must be rendered incapable of cool reflection.” | 3 |
| 5 | Colette Reyes v. State | green | “evidence that is factually sufficient” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.