Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re the Personal Restraint of Goodwin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re the Personal Restraint of Goodwin Anchor | green | “the judgment and sentence evidences the invalidity without further elaboration.” | 6 |
| 2 | In Re Crabtree | green | “moreover, there is evidence outside the guilty plea, showing that crabtree did commit the offenses during the statutory period.” | 3 |
| 3 | In re the Personal Restraint of Crabtree | green | “his convictions are facially valid.” | 3 |
| 4 | In re the Personal Restraint of Crabtree | green | “moreover, there is evidence outside the guilty plea, showing that crabtree did commit the offenses during the statutory period.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Parker | green | “evidence was given showing parker committed the acts before the increase in penalties.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Aho | green | “because the jury did not identify when the acts that it found constituted the offenses occurred, it is possible that aho has been illegally convicted based upon an act or acts occurring before the effective date of the child molestation statute.” | 3 |
| 7 | In re the Personal Restraint of Toledo-Sotelo | green | “for a judgment to exceed the court's statutory authority, we require more than an error that 'invites the court to exceed its authority'; the sentencing court must actually pass down a sentence not authorized under the sentencing reform act of 1981, chapter 9.94a rcw (sra).” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.