Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Material Service Corp. v. Department of Revenue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Material Service Corp. v. Department of Revenue Anchor | green | “findings of the trial court adverse to the appellee do not require the appellee's cross-appeal if the judgment of the trial court was not at least in part against the appellee.” | 5 |
| 2 | Manago v. The County of Cook | green | “whenever possible, courts must enforce clear and unambiguous statutory language as written, without reading in unstated exceptions, conditions, or limitations.” | 4 |
| 3 | Accel Entertainment Gaming, LLC v. Village of Elmwood Park | green | “the legislature's silence on the power of home rule units is actually evidence of the home rule unit's power.” | 3 |
| 4 | Alford v. Shelton (In Re Estate of Shelton) | green | “must not depart from the plain meaning of the statutory language by reading into it exceptions, limitations, or conditions not expressed by the legislature.” | 3 |
| 5 | Fogt v. 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC | green | “the denial of a summary judgment motion is not a final order and is normally not appealable even where the court has made a finding pursuant to illinois supreme court rule 304(a).” | 3 |
| 6 | Iwan Ries & Co. v. City of Chicago | green | “the assumption that municipalities should be allowed to address their problems by tailoring solutions to local needs.” | 3 |
| 7 | Nolan v. Granite City | green | “we find no intention to repeal ordinance no. 2574 in ordinance 2910 or any evidence of inconsistency between the two.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.