Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Garcia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Garcia Anchor | green | “limited transitory sense of privacy.” | 5 |
| 2 | People v. Hallam | green | “room within the business where the buying and selling of goods or services does not occur” | 5 |
| 3 | Harris v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County | green | “also expressly states an intent to 'require misdemeanors instead of felonies for nonserious, nonviolent crimes like petty theft and drug possession, unless the defendant has prior convictions for specified violent or serious crimes.” | 5 |
| 4 | People v. Gonzales | green | “use of the term 'larceny' in section 459.5, coupled with labeling the offense 'shoplifting,' exhibited an intent by the electorate to limit that offense to the 'common understanding of shoplifting,' which she characterizes as taking goods from a store.” | 5 |
| 5 | People v. Garcia | green | “a separate and objectively reasonable expectation of protection from intrusion, distinct from that provided by the security of the overarching structure.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.