Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. McCarty.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. McCarty Anchor | green | “related to the subject matter of the case” | 5 |
| 2 | Matter of Buehler v. Bd. of Supervisors | neutral | “a similarly situated defendant in a criminal proceeding would be entitled to access to the impeachment materials requested by appellant” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. McCarty | green | “relates to the subject matter of the case” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Coley | green | “all evidence and information . . . that tends to . . . impeach the credibility of a testifying prosecution witness.” | 4 |
| 5 | People v. Coley | green | “part of a broader criminal justice reform package aimed at creating a more transparent and equitable criminal justice system,” | 4 |
| 6 | People v. Coley | green | “the legislature did not intend to create an additional layer of analysis, to be employed by the prosecution, when determining what is 'related to the subject matter of the case' in regard to impeachment material” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.