3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rohrbough v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rohrbough v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. Anchor | green | “f plaintiffs genuinely were concerned that defendant's motion was premature, plaintiffs should have sought relief under fed. r. civ. p. 56.” | 10 |
| 2 | Cooper v. Rodriguez | green | “correctional officer employed by the division of correction of the maryland dpscs is a state employee for purposes of the mtca and also a public official for purposes of common law public official immunity.” | 4 |
| 3 | Gray v. Maryland | green | “in order for a plaintiff to bring a claim against the state or a state officer under the mtca, certain notice requirements must be met.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.