Topic: do not collide directly with substantive statutory commands… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #17225

7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Adams v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Adams v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Anchor
ca1 · 1994
green “do not collide directly with substantive statutory commands and so long as procedural corners are squarely turned.” 4
2 Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
ca1 · 1994
green “is magnified when the agency interprets its own regulations.” 4
3 Puerto Rico Sun Oil Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
ca1 · 1993
green “must make sense to the reviewing court.” 3
4 Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
ca1 · 1994
green “it is reductions in rent that are expressly proscribed by section 1437f(c)(2)(c).” 3
5 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald E. GREEN, Law Offices, Defendant-Appellee
ca1 · 1996
green “the record discloses no trialworthy issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” 3
6 Astrid L. Portela-Gonzalez v. Secretary of the Navy
ca1 · 1997
green “in practice, the doctrine has softer edges than this language implies.” 3
7 Trafalgar Capital Associates, Inc. v. Cisneros
mad · 1997
green “are subject to post-audit and change in accordance with hud requirements, including the correction of errors in computation.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check