Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Yanez-Huerta.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Yanez-Huerta Anchor | green | “a refusal to grant a downward departure is a violation of law only if the court mistakenly assumes that it lacks authority to depart.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. Archie Kelly | green | “required to receive a supervised release term of not less than nor more than three years.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Hugh Von Meshack Lawayne Thomas Linda Parker Terrence Ian Hodges, Also Known as Guda | green | “under plain error review, we correct overlong terms of supervised release.” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Billy Mel Alford | green | “estimates of the quantity of drugs for sentencing purposes.” | 4 |
| 5 | United States v. Daniel Vasquez | green | “the government has the burden of proof under 2d1.1 of showing by a preponderance of the evidence 'that a temporal and spatial relation existed between the weapon, the drug trafficking activity, and the defendant.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.