Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 164 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carolyn T. Rodgers v. Elizabeth Banks.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carolyn T. Rodgers v. Elizabeth Banks Anchor | green | “the party bringing the summary judgment motion has the initial burden of informing the court of the basis for its motion and identifying portions of the record that demonstrate the absence of a genuine dispute over material facts.” | 70 |
| 2 | Julie Peffer v. Mike Stephens | green | “a genuine dispute of material fact exists 'if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 44 |
| 3 | Carolyn T. Rodgers v. Elizabeth Banks | green | “the moving party may satisfy this burden by presenting affirmative evidence that negates an element of the non-moving party's claim or by demonstrating an absence of evidence to support the non- moving party's case.” | 19 |
| 4 | Quoc Viet v. Victor Le | green | “there can be no genuine issue as to any material fact, since a complete failure of proof concerning an essential element of the non-moving party's case necessarily renders all other facts immaterial.” | 9 |
| 5 | Andrea Miller v. Woodston Maddox | green | “the moving party may satisfy this burden by presenting affirmative evidence that negates an element of the non-moving party's claim or by demonstrating an absence of evidence to support the non- moving party's case.” | 8 |
| 6 | Julie Peffer v. Mike Stephens | green | “evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.