Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McKeiver v. Pennsylvania.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McKeiver v. Pennsylvania Anchor | green | “if the jury trial were to be injected into the juvenile court system as a matter of right, it would bring with it into that system the traditional delay, the formality, and the clamor of the adversary system and, possibly, the public trial.” | 14 |
| 2 | People v. Prude | green | “receiving an incriminating statement from a juvenile is a sensitive concern requiring great care, in the absence of counsel, to assure the juvenile's confession was neither coerced or suggested, nor a product of fright or despair.” | 3 |
| 3 | People Ex Rel. Carey v. Chrastka | green | “determinate confinement, which has as its purpose the protection of society, in addition to the rehabilitation of the individual.” | 3 |
| 4 | People Ex Rel. Carey v. Chrastka | green | “results in a disposition, determinate confinement, which has as its purpose the protection of society, in addition to the rehabilitation of the individual.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.