Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters Anchor | green | “completely unrelated to the simple question whether a trespass had occurred.” | 8 |
| 2 | Lumber Production Industrial Workers Local # 1054, Et Al., v. West Coast Industrial Relations Association, Inc. | green | “crucial element of a state court action is identical to an element of an unfair labor practice that is arguably covered by the nlra, then the state action is preempted.” | 3 |
| 3 | Salmon Run Shopping Center LLC v. National Labor Relations Board | green | “private property owner must treat a nonemployee union speaker who seeks to communicate on a subject protected by section 7 less favorably than another person communicating on the same subject.” | 3 |
| 4 | Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp. | green | “unlawful interference with walmart's possession” | 3 |
| 5 | Hillhaven Oakland Nursing & Rehabilitation Center v. Health Care Workers Union | green | “questions involving the alleged trespass, the number of union representatives allowed to enter the facility, and where those representatives were permitted access would appear to be issues turning upon interpretation of the bargaining agreement in the first instance.” | 3 |
| 6 | City of San Jose v. Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 | green | “the local concern doctrine has generally been applied in cases where it was necessary to 'maintain civil order by deterring and punishing violence and other intentional torts, including defamation, trespass, and infliction of emotional distress.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.