Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip Anchor | green | “draw a mathematical bright line between the constitutionally acceptable and the constitutionally unacceptable that would fit every case.” | 12 |
| 2 | Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip | green | “we need not, and indeed we cannot, draw a mathematical bright line between the constitutionally acceptable and the constitutionally unacceptable that would fit every case.” | 8 |
| 3 | Davis v. Celotex Corp. | green | “it seems highly illogical and unfair for courts to determine at what point punitive damage awards should cease.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.