Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thompson Everett, Inc. v. National Cable Advertising, L.P. Cable Networks, Inc. Cable Media Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thompson Everett, Inc. v. National Cable Advertising, L.P. Cable Networks, Inc. Cable Media Corporation Anchor | green | “the disputed facts must be material to an issue necessary for the proper resolution of the case, and the quality and quantity of the evidence offered to create a question of fact must be adequate.” | 18 |
| 2 | Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. City of Alexandria | green | “rule upon each party's motion separately and determine whether summary judgment is appropriate as to each under the federal rule of civil procedure 56 standard.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.