Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mendez Marrero v. Toledo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mendez Marrero v. Toledo Anchor | green | “when a party opposing a motion for summary judgment fails to comply with the 'anti-ferret rule,' the statement of material facts filed by the party seeking summary judgment shall be deemed ... admitted.” | 12 |
| 2 | Mendez Marrero v. Toledo | green | “it launches the nonmovant's case down the road towards an easy dismissal.” | 7 |
| 3 | Morales v. A.C. Orssleff's EFTF | green | “will be deemed to be admitted unless controverted by the statement required to be served by the opposing party.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.