Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Avia Dynamics, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Avia Dynamics, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration Anchor | green | “the date the order is officially made public.” | 5 |
| 2 | Avia Dynamics, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration | green | “delays the start of the sixty-day filing period” | 3 |
| 3 | Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Federal Aviation Administration | green | “rarely finds 'reasonable grounds' under section 46110(a).” | 3 |
| 4 | Friedman v. Federal Aviation Administration | green | “mark the consummation of the agency's decisionmaking process,” | 3 |
| 5 | City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta | green | “led to the effects petitioners sought to reverse: increased noise in certain areas of phoenix.” | 3 |
| 6 | City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta | green | “left parties 'with the impression that it would address their concerns” | 3 |
| 7 | City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta | green | “reaffirmed the agency's decision not to conduct further review of the new flight paths' environmental impact.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.