Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Martin Gonzalez Munoz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Martin Gonzalez Munoz Anchor | green | “(1) the magnitude of the statement's prejudice, (2) the effect of any cautionary instructions given, and (3) the strength of the evidence of the defendant's guilt.” | 9 |
| 2 | United States v. Joseph Ladd | green | “testimony by a witness that he recognized the accused by his voice is admissible, provided that the witness has some basis for comparison of the accused's voice with the voice which he has identified as that of the accused.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. James L. Hays and Weldon J. Hays | green | “as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Andrew J. Loney | green | “a prosecutor may recite to the jury those inferences and conclusions she wishes them to draw from the evidence so long as those inferences are grounded upon the evidence.” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Christopher Barry Greer, Daniel Alvis Wood, Sean Christian Tarrant, Michael Lewis Lawrence, and Lance Jon Jordan | green | “a court abuses its discretion when the scope of voir dire is inadequate to discover bias and deprives the defendant of an opportunity to make reasonable use of peremptory challenges.” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Felmon Lakeith Laury, A/K/A Felmon Keith Ashley, A/K/A Walter Ray Nicholson | green | “that the defendant did not remain completely silent following his arrest did not give the prosecutor unbridled freedom to impeach him by commenting on what he did not say following his arrest.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.