Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ted JOSEY, Appellant, v. JOHN R. HOLLINGSWORTH CORPORATION, Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ted JOSEY, Appellant, v. JOHN R. HOLLINGSWORTH CORPORATION, Appellee Anchor | green | “in deciding a motion for summary judgment, the judge's function is to determine if there is a genuine issue for trial.” | 15 |
| 2 | New Jersey v. Moran-Hernandez (In re Moran-Hernandez) | green | “once the moving party establishes the absence of a genuine dispute of material fact, however, the burden shifts to the non-moving party to 'do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.