Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Timothy Lynn Calverley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Timothy Lynn Calverley Anchor | green | “seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” | 10 |
| 2 | United States v. Williams | green | “may question witnesses and elicit facts not yet adduced or clarify those previously presented.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Timothy Lynn Calverley | green | “seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Joel Juan Rodriguez | green | “a trial judge has wide discretion over the 'tone and tempo' of a trial and may elicit further information from a witness if he believes it would benefit the jury.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.