Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James L. Cain v. Michael P. Lane.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James L. Cain v. Michael P. Lane Anchor | green | “chronology of events from which retaliation may plausibly be inferred.” | 8 |
| 2 | Kevin R. Black v. Al C. Parke, Kenneth Case, Walt Chapleau, and Tom Campbell | green | “the procedural due process required before one may be deprived of a liberty interest is governed by federal constitutional law and not state law.” | 6 |
| 3 | James L. Cain v. Michael P. Lane | green | “a chronology of events from which retaliation may plausibly be inferred.” | 5 |
| 4 | Richard W. Norton v. Al C. Parke | green | “because it establishes the law governing the present action and 'there is no sixth circuit published opinion that would serve as well.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.