Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stone v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stone v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation Anchor | green | “only on the basis of a compelling governmental interest, and only if the denial is narrowly tailored to serve that interest.” | 10 |
| 2 | Stone v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation | green | “when the first amendment provides a right of access, a district court may restrict access 'only on the basis of a compelling governmental interest, and only if the denial is narrowly tailored to serve that interest.” | 7 |
| 3 | Columbus-America Discovery Group v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company | green | “it is hardly possible to come to a reasonable conclusion on that score without knowing the facts of the case.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.