Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from George & Co. LLC v. Imagination Entertainment Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | George & Co. LLC v. Imagination Entertainment Ltd. Anchor | green | “actual confusion can be demonstrated by both anecdotal and survey evidence.” | 7 |
| 2 | Carefirst Of Maryland, Incorporated v. First Care, P.C. | green | “the strength of a mark is the degree to which a consumer in the relevant population, upon encountering the mark, would associate the mark with a unique source.” | 6 |
| 3 | Carefirst Of Maryland, Incorporated v. First Care, P.C. | green | “a strong trademark is one that is rarely used by parties other than the owner of the trademark, while a weak trademark is one that is often used by other parties.” | 5 |
| 4 | Carefirst Of Maryland, Incorporated v. First Care, P.C. | green | “a substantial number of present or prospective customers understand the designation when used in connection with a business to refer to a particular person or business enterprise.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.