Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 162 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne County Anchor | green | “where a prisoner has received some medical attention and the dispute is over the adequacy of the treatment, federal courts are generally reluctant to second guess medical judgments and to constitutionalize claims which sound in state tort law.” | 114 |
| 2 | Alspaugh v. McConnell | green | “so woefully inadequate as to amount to no treatment at all.” | 48 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.