Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cheryl Lowe v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cheryl Lowe v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration Anchor | green | “where adequately explained and supported, credibility findings are for the alj to make.” | 13 |
| 2 | Stanley E. Schultz v. Michael J. Astrue, 1 Commissioner of Social Security | green | “defer to an alj's credibility finding as long as the alj explicitly discredits a claimant's testimony and gives a good reason for doing so.” | 7 |
| 3 | Mitchell W. MACKEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “but we do include such evidence in the substantial evidence equation,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.