Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 162 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta Anchor | green | “may show that the record in fact contains supporting evidence, sufficient to withstand a directed verdict motion, which was 'overlooked or ignored' by the moving party, who has thus failed to meet the initial burden of showing an absence of evidence.” | 57 |
| 2 | FindWhat Investor Group v. FindWhat. Com | green | “a reasonable jury to return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 51 |
| 3 | Marvin Morris v. Harold Ross | green | “may come forward with additional evidence sufficient to withstand a directed verdict motion at trial based on the alleged evidentiary deficiency.” | 42 |
| 4 | Ed Rich v. Larry C. Dollar | green | “he was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority when the allegedly wrongful acts occurred.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.