Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Parisi v. the Boeing Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parisi v. the Boeing Company Anchor | green | “the reason for requiring the pursuit of administrative remedies first is to provide the eeoc with an initial opportunity to investigate allegations of employment discrimination and to work with the parties toward voluntary compliance and conciliation.” | 11 |
| 2 | Malik Weatherly v. Ford Motor Company | green | “invent, ex nihilo, a claim that was not made before the relevant agency.” | 5 |
| 3 | Malik Weatherly v. Ford Motor Company | green | “the key is that the scope of a judicial complaint can be no broader than the scope of the eeoc investigation that could reasonably be expected to grow out of the charge in the eeoc complaint.” | 4 |
| 4 | Keith HINDMAN, Appellant, v. TRANSKRIT CORPORATION, Appellee | green | “the adea prohibits an employer from discharging 'any individual or otherwise discriminating against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's age.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.