Topic: summary judgment is appropriate if there is no genuine issu… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #17540

3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from First Commerce Corporation, and Fdic, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and First Commerce Savings Bank v. United States.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 First Commerce Corporation, and Fdic, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and First Commerce Savings Bank v. United States Anchor
ca1 · 2003
green “summary judgment is appropriate if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” 14
2 The Bubble Room, Inc. v. United States
cafc · 1999
green “the moving party bears the burden of establishing the absence of any genuine issue of material fact and all significant doubt over factual issues must be resolved in the opposing party's favor.” 5
3 Tesoro Hawaii Corporation, Tesoro Alaska Company and Hermes Consolidated, Inc., D/B/A Wyoming Refining Company v. United States
cafc · 2005
green “when there is no ambiguity in the meaning of the regulation, 'it is the duty of the courts to enforce it according to its obvious terms and not to insert words and phrases so as to incorporate therein a new and distinct provision.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check