Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Donelson v. Darrise Hardy & Wexford Health Sources, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Donelson v. Darrise Hardy & Wexford Health Sources, Inc. Anchor | green | “the extent of the misconduct, the ineffectiveness of lesser sanctions, the harm from the misconduct, and the weakness of the case.” | 9 |
| 2 | Annete M. Allen, Shelley S. Burnette, Rahpre Newberry, and Earnest Leonard v. Chicago Transit Authority | green | “should be proportionate to the gravity of the offense.” | 5 |
| 3 | Donelson v. Darrise Hardy & Wexford Health Sources, Inc. | green | “sanctions, including dismissal, must be proportionate to the circumstances. considerations relevant to proportionality include the extent of the misconduct, the ineffectiveness of lesser sanctions, the harm from the misconduct, and the weakness of the case.” | 5 |
| 4 | Waivio v. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois | green | “inherent authority to sanction litigants for abuse of process.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.